'Weak Dependency Graph [60.0]' ------------------------------ Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost runtime-complexity with respect to Rules: { f(s(X), X) -> f(X, a(X)) , f(X, c(X)) -> f(s(X), X) , f(X, X) -> c(X)} Details: We have computed the following set of weak (innermost) dependency pairs: { f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X))) , f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X)) , f^#(X, X) -> c_2()} The usable rules are: {} The estimated dependency graph contains the following edges: {f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X)))} ==> {f^#(X, X) -> c_2()} {f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X)))} ==> {f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X)))} {f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))} ==> {f^#(X, X) -> c_2()} {f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))} ==> {f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))} {f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))} ==> {f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X)))} We consider the following path(s): 1) { f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X)) , f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X))) , f^#(X, X) -> c_2()} The usable rules for this path are empty. We have oriented the usable rules with the following strongly linear interpretation: Interpretation Functions: f(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] s(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] a(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] f^#(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] c_0(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_2() = [0] We have applied the subprocessor on the resulting DP-problem: 'Weight Gap Principle' ---------------------- Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: {f^#(X, X) -> c_2()} Weak Rules: { f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X))) , f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))} Details: We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules {f^#(X, X) -> c_2()} and weakly orienting the rules { f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X))) , f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: {f^#(X, X) -> c_2()} Details: Interpretation Functions: f(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] s(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] a(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] f^#(x1, x2) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [1] c_0(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c_2() = [0] Finally we apply the subprocessor 'Empty TRS' ----------- Answer: YES(?,O(1)) Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: {} Weak Rules: { f^#(X, X) -> c_2() , f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X))) , f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))} Details: The given problem does not contain any strict rules 2) { f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X)) , f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X)))} The usable rules for this path are empty. We have oriented the usable rules with the following strongly linear interpretation: Interpretation Functions: f(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] s(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] a(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] f^#(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] c_0(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_2() = [0] We have applied the subprocessor on the resulting DP-problem: 'Weight Gap Principle' ---------------------- Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: {f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X)))} Weak Rules: {f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))} Details: We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules {f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X)))} and weakly orienting the rules {f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: {f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X)))} Details: Interpretation Functions: f(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] s(x1) = [1] x1 + [8] a(x1) = [1] x1 + [3] c(x1) = [1] x1 + [12] f^#(x1, x2) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [9] c_0(x1) = [1] x1 + [4] c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [3] c_2() = [0] Finally we apply the subprocessor 'Empty TRS' ----------- Answer: YES(?,O(1)) Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: {} Weak Rules: { f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X))) , f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))} Details: The given problem does not contain any strict rules 3) { f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X)) , f^#(X, X) -> c_2()} The usable rules for this path are empty. We have oriented the usable rules with the following strongly linear interpretation: Interpretation Functions: f(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] s(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] a(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] f^#(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] c_0(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_2() = [0] We have applied the subprocessor on the resulting DP-problem: 'Weight Gap Principle' ---------------------- Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: {f^#(X, X) -> c_2()} Weak Rules: {f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))} Details: We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules {f^#(X, X) -> c_2()} and weakly orienting the rules {f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: {f^#(X, X) -> c_2()} Details: Interpretation Functions: f(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] s(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] a(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] f^#(x1, x2) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [1] c_0(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c_2() = [0] Finally we apply the subprocessor 'Empty TRS' ----------- Answer: YES(?,O(1)) Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: {} Weak Rules: { f^#(X, X) -> c_2() , f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))} Details: The given problem does not contain any strict rules 4) {f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))} The usable rules for this path are empty. We have oriented the usable rules with the following strongly linear interpretation: Interpretation Functions: f(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] s(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] a(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] f^#(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] c_0(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_2() = [0] We have applied the subprocessor on the resulting DP-problem: 'Weight Gap Principle' ---------------------- Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: {f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))} Weak Rules: {} Details: We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules {f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))} and weakly orienting the rules {} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: {f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))} Details: Interpretation Functions: f(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] s(x1) = [1] x1 + [3] a(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c(x1) = [1] x1 + [8] f^#(x1, x2) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [9] c_0(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [4] c_2() = [0] Finally we apply the subprocessor 'Empty TRS' ----------- Answer: YES(?,O(1)) Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: {} Weak Rules: {f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))} Details: The given problem does not contain any strict rules