'Weak Dependency Graph [60.0]'
------------------------------
Answer: YES(?,O(n^1))
Input Problem: innermost runtime-complexity with respect to
Rules:
{ f(s(X), X) -> f(X, a(X))
, f(X, c(X)) -> f(s(X), X)
, f(X, X) -> c(X)}
Details:
We have computed the following set of weak (innermost) dependency pairs:
{ f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X)))
, f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))
, f^#(X, X) -> c_2()}
The usable rules are:
{}
The estimated dependency graph contains the following edges:
{f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X)))}
==> {f^#(X, X) -> c_2()}
{f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X)))}
==> {f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X)))}
{f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))}
==> {f^#(X, X) -> c_2()}
{f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))}
==> {f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))}
{f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))}
==> {f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X)))}
We consider the following path(s):
1) { f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))
, f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X)))
, f^#(X, X) -> c_2()}
The usable rules for this path are empty.
We have oriented the usable rules with the following strongly linear interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
f(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0]
s(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
a(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
c(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
f^#(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0]
c_0(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
c_1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
c_2() = [0]
We have applied the subprocessor on the resulting DP-problem:
'Weight Gap Principle'
----------------------
Answer: YES(?,O(n^1))
Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to
Strict Rules: {f^#(X, X) -> c_2()}
Weak Rules:
{ f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X)))
, f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))}
Details:
We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules
{f^#(X, X) -> c_2()}
and weakly orienting the rules
{ f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X)))
, f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))}
using the following strongly linear interpretation:
Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly:
{f^#(X, X) -> c_2()}
Details:
Interpretation Functions:
f(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0]
s(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
a(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
c(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
f^#(x1, x2) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [1]
c_0(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
c_2() = [0]
Finally we apply the subprocessor
'Empty TRS'
-----------
Answer: YES(?,O(1))
Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to
Strict Rules: {}
Weak Rules:
{ f^#(X, X) -> c_2()
, f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X)))
, f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))}
Details:
The given problem does not contain any strict rules
2) { f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))
, f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X)))}
The usable rules for this path are empty.
We have oriented the usable rules with the following strongly linear interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
f(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0]
s(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
a(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
c(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
f^#(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0]
c_0(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
c_1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
c_2() = [0]
We have applied the subprocessor on the resulting DP-problem:
'Weight Gap Principle'
----------------------
Answer: YES(?,O(n^1))
Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to
Strict Rules: {f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X)))}
Weak Rules: {f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))}
Details:
We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules
{f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X)))}
and weakly orienting the rules
{f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))}
using the following strongly linear interpretation:
Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly:
{f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X)))}
Details:
Interpretation Functions:
f(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0]
s(x1) = [1] x1 + [8]
a(x1) = [1] x1 + [3]
c(x1) = [1] x1 + [12]
f^#(x1, x2) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [9]
c_0(x1) = [1] x1 + [4]
c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [3]
c_2() = [0]
Finally we apply the subprocessor
'Empty TRS'
-----------
Answer: YES(?,O(1))
Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to
Strict Rules: {}
Weak Rules:
{ f^#(s(X), X) -> c_0(f^#(X, a(X)))
, f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))}
Details:
The given problem does not contain any strict rules
3) { f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))
, f^#(X, X) -> c_2()}
The usable rules for this path are empty.
We have oriented the usable rules with the following strongly linear interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
f(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0]
s(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
a(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
c(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
f^#(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0]
c_0(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
c_1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
c_2() = [0]
We have applied the subprocessor on the resulting DP-problem:
'Weight Gap Principle'
----------------------
Answer: YES(?,O(n^1))
Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to
Strict Rules: {f^#(X, X) -> c_2()}
Weak Rules: {f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))}
Details:
We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules
{f^#(X, X) -> c_2()}
and weakly orienting the rules
{f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))}
using the following strongly linear interpretation:
Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly:
{f^#(X, X) -> c_2()}
Details:
Interpretation Functions:
f(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0]
s(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
a(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
c(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
f^#(x1, x2) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [1]
c_0(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [0]
c_2() = [0]
Finally we apply the subprocessor
'Empty TRS'
-----------
Answer: YES(?,O(1))
Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to
Strict Rules: {}
Weak Rules:
{ f^#(X, X) -> c_2()
, f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))}
Details:
The given problem does not contain any strict rules
4) {f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))}
The usable rules for this path are empty.
We have oriented the usable rules with the following strongly linear interpretation:
Interpretation Functions:
f(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0]
s(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
a(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
c(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
f^#(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0]
c_0(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
c_1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
c_2() = [0]
We have applied the subprocessor on the resulting DP-problem:
'Weight Gap Principle'
----------------------
Answer: YES(?,O(n^1))
Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to
Strict Rules: {f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))}
Weak Rules: {}
Details:
We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules
{f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))}
and weakly orienting the rules
{}
using the following strongly linear interpretation:
Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly:
{f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))}
Details:
Interpretation Functions:
f(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0]
s(x1) = [1] x1 + [3]
a(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
c(x1) = [1] x1 + [8]
f^#(x1, x2) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [9]
c_0(x1) = [0] x1 + [0]
c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [4]
c_2() = [0]
Finally we apply the subprocessor
'Empty TRS'
-----------
Answer: YES(?,O(1))
Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to
Strict Rules: {}
Weak Rules: {f^#(X, c(X)) -> c_1(f^#(s(X), X))}
Details:
The given problem does not contain any strict rules